This might sound counterintuitive.
But in many cases, a performance agency is more effective when it does not produce the creatives itself.
Why?
Because there is no emotional attachment.
If an ad underperforms - it is paused.
If a concept fails - it is replaced.
If the data says it does not work - it is gone.
No internal politics.
No defending bad ideas.
No protecting someone’s favorite concept because “we worked so hard on it.”
And no pushing the client into a fixed monthly creative package just to justify in-house salaries, overhead, or long production cycles.
Performance does not care about sunk costs.
Zero Attachment = Faster Decisions
When the performance team is independent from production:
- Creatives are judged purely by numbers
- Decisions are faster
- Ego is removed from the equation
- Iteration cycles are shorter
The question becomes simple:
Is it profitable? - If not, replace it.
Vendor Flexibility Is a Strategic Advantage
An agency that is not locked into its own production team has flexibility.
One campaign might require:
- A UGC creator
- A fast-turnaround TikTok specialist
- A high-end studio production
- A motion graphics freelancer
- A niche B2B copy expert
There is no stylistic limitation.
No internal capacity ceiling.
No pressure to “make it work” because time was already invested.
You can even test multiple vendors simultaneously and let performance decide who stays.
That is real creative testing.
The Hidden Bias When Agencies Produce In-House
When the same agency is responsible for both performance and production, a bias naturally appears.
If creatives underperform:
- The audience gets blamed
- The platform gets blamed
- The targeting gets blamed
- Seasonality gets blamed
Rarely does the creative get questioned first.
Because questioning the creative means questioning internal work.
And that is uncomfortable.
Over time, this creates a ceiling.
Performance becomes limited by the agency’s own production capacity - not by market potential.
Performance Mindset vs Creative Mindset
There is nothing wrong with creative agencies.
But the mindset is different.
A creative agency optimizes for:
- Brand consistency
- Visual identity
- Artistic quality
- Campaign cohesion
A performance-driven agency optimizes for:
- Cost per result
- Revenue contribution
- Iteration velocity
- Signal strength
Creatives are not sacred objects - they are variables.
And variables exist to be tested, replaced, improved, or removed.
When you operate in pure performance mode, the only thing that truly matters is measurable outcome.
Not ego.
Not effort.
Not attachment.
Just results.



